Skip to contents

Devnote: uncertain about replace_na(1) – is it doing as intended?

Usage

prep_inputs_pe_paired_census_index_counts(
  days,
  dwg_summarized,
  interview_ang_per_object,
  census_expan,
  study_design
)

Arguments

days

tibble with time strata and closure fields

dwg_summarized

list with shared interview, index and census tibbles

interview_ang_per_object

tibble of interview-based values to translate vehicle/trailer counts to boat/bank

census_expan

tibble summarizing p_census by angler_final and section_num where p_census is a hard coded value in the database specifying the proportion of a section that is covered during a census count; values less than 1 with result in census counts being expanded (e.g., census count divided by p_census)

study_design

parameter specifying study design and which if/else loop gets called below

Value

?